No Fault Divorce Provokes Murder in Texas
Harris attempts to
send a clear message
Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 02-13-03
The District Attorney told the jury of the options available to Ms Harris, rather than committing murder. The jury was told that if he is unfaithful, she could kick him out of his house, take his kids, take him to the cleaners, and make his life a living Hell.
"No fault" divorce disallows this blatant act of betrayal to be used as a lever in a divorce proceeding and Ms Harris was not the mother of this father's child. Ms Harris could only be guaranteed half of her husband's assets if she did the right thing and filed for divorce in "civil" court. Getting custody of her unfaithful husband's child would bring a tidy percentage of the only biological parent's income, but her income might be comparable and would guarantee a trial.
Ms Harris knows that any wife could bear the fruit of her neighborhood's loins, and have the right or the duty to kick her husband out of the house, take his kids, take him to the cleaners, and make his life a living Hell. Ms Harris was not in fear of what she stood to lose, she was enraged that an unfaithful hose-bucket that commits paternity fraud would be financially independent, while Ms Harris would only get severance pay for her undying devotion and monogamy.
It seems like only yesterday, divorce courts would argue endlessly about infidelity, mental cruelty, sexual abandonment, and a litany of relationship rhetoric. Now, "no fault" divorce has boiled down to incurable insanity or irreconcilable differences, to allow the civil court to establish a child support cash flow.
Ms Harris knew that there would be no justice in civil court, and was experiencing a watered down version of the outrage experienced by any noncustodial parent, who expects due process in a "no fault" divorce court. The motive for a family law murder is strong enough to justify the homicide in some "no fault" divorce states.
Ms Harris intended to send a clear message; "Betrayal in all its forms, has no place in civilized society".
Ms Harris went to where she told the Private Investigators to go, after she gathered up her husband's child. Ms Harris was going to show this child what kind of father she had. Ms Harris was planning to confront her husband escorting his mistress and provoke him to kick her ass on film in front of his child. Ms Harris was going to drag herself back to the car all bloody and scream "see what you father did to me? What kind of man is he?"
Ms Harris was not going to get her poetic justice that easy, because he didn't fall for that old trick. Ms Harris climbed into the car, next to this man's child, and crushed him over and over and over again, while his child begged her and begged her and begged her to stop.
The jury would hear of her continuous devotion, her parenting miracles, her successful career, and a courtroom full of positive character witnesses. The jury would hear of the dates and times of the recorded interludes with the victim's receptionist, by a team of private investigators. The jury would see 27 8x10 color glossy photographs, with circles and arrows, and a paragraph on the back of each one, explaining what each one was, to be used as evidence against him.
The jurors placed themselves in Ms Harris's shoes and decided, "I would have taken half his assets, moved out, and requested visitation with his child. If this were Robert Blake it would be different, he was acting out of fear. This woman had nothing to lose, and she did it in front of the kid".
The family law system provoked this act of violence and has completely shattered an innocent child's life. Father dead, Grandma and Grandpa glad he is, and a step-mom who may someday be released. The child needs a parachute, a life raft, or something to reassure her that this is not normal. .
The Family Law system incorporates "no fault" divorce to grease the skids, for the state's money machine of mass destruction. A partnership contract founded on monogamy and sanctified before the Lord is only viewed as proof of paternity in today's family court.
Mississippi is the only state that still entertains "yo fault" divorce. Mississippi only demands 14% of an NCP's net income for 1 child, 20% for 2, and 22% for 3. Reasonable child support and causal divorce prevents family law homicides and the segregation of children and parents. Heterosexual taxpayers that dare to raise children are urged to seek asylum in Mississippi to avoid slavery.
Jim Untershine, 824 E Pass Rd #3, Gulfport, MS 39507, firstname.lastname@example.org, www.gndzerosrv.com
Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.